Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. / Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar; Dinesen, Peter Thisted.

I: Political Behavior, Bind 38, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 179-202.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sønderskov, KM & Dinesen, PT 2016, 'Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust', Political Behavior, bind 38, nr. 1, s. 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

APA

Sønderskov, K. M., & Dinesen, P. T. (2016). Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior, 38(1), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

Vancouver

Sønderskov KM, Dinesen PT. Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. Political Behavior. 2016;38(1):179-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

Author

Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar ; Dinesen, Peter Thisted. / Trusting the state, trusting each other? The effect of institutional trust on social trust. I: Political Behavior. 2016 ; Bind 38, Nr. 1. s. 179-202.

Bibtex

@article{8203719668a642719cce9e74f60d7552,
title = "Trusting the state, trusting each other?: The effect of institutional trust on social trust",
abstract = "Trust in state institutions is a prominent explanation of social trust. However, previous—mainly cross-sectional—analyses provide limited causal evidence regarding the relationship between institutional trust and social trust and it is thus essentially unknown whether an observed relationship reflects reverse causality (social trust forming institutional trust), or both forms of trust reflecting deep-seated dispositions (common confounding). Against the backdrop of the shortcomings of previous cross-sectional analyses, this paper utilizes two Danish panel surveys containing measures of both types of trust for the same individuals surveyed at multiple points in time over a long time-span (up to 18 years) to address the potentially reverse and/or spurious relationship. Using individual fixed effects and cross-lagged panel models, the results provide strong evidence of trust in state institutions exercising a causal impact on social trust, whereas the evidence for a reverse relationship is limited.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Social trust, Institutional trust, Panel data",
author = "S{\o}nderskov, {Kim Mannemar} and Dinesen, {Peter Thisted}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "179--202",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trusting the state, trusting each other?

T2 - The effect of institutional trust on social trust

AU - Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar

AU - Dinesen, Peter Thisted

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Trust in state institutions is a prominent explanation of social trust. However, previous—mainly cross-sectional—analyses provide limited causal evidence regarding the relationship between institutional trust and social trust and it is thus essentially unknown whether an observed relationship reflects reverse causality (social trust forming institutional trust), or both forms of trust reflecting deep-seated dispositions (common confounding). Against the backdrop of the shortcomings of previous cross-sectional analyses, this paper utilizes two Danish panel surveys containing measures of both types of trust for the same individuals surveyed at multiple points in time over a long time-span (up to 18 years) to address the potentially reverse and/or spurious relationship. Using individual fixed effects and cross-lagged panel models, the results provide strong evidence of trust in state institutions exercising a causal impact on social trust, whereas the evidence for a reverse relationship is limited.

AB - Trust in state institutions is a prominent explanation of social trust. However, previous—mainly cross-sectional—analyses provide limited causal evidence regarding the relationship between institutional trust and social trust and it is thus essentially unknown whether an observed relationship reflects reverse causality (social trust forming institutional trust), or both forms of trust reflecting deep-seated dispositions (common confounding). Against the backdrop of the shortcomings of previous cross-sectional analyses, this paper utilizes two Danish panel surveys containing measures of both types of trust for the same individuals surveyed at multiple points in time over a long time-span (up to 18 years) to address the potentially reverse and/or spurious relationship. Using individual fixed effects and cross-lagged panel models, the results provide strong evidence of trust in state institutions exercising a causal impact on social trust, whereas the evidence for a reverse relationship is limited.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Social trust

KW - Institutional trust

KW - Panel data

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

DO - 10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 179

EP - 202

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 145245050