Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Ruling the Interregnum : Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times. / Stahl, Rune Møller.

I: Politics and Society, Bind 47, Nr. 3, 2019, s. 333-360.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Stahl, RM 2019, 'Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times', Politics and Society, bind 47, nr. 3, s. 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219851896

APA

Stahl, R. M. (2019). Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times. Politics and Society, 47(3), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219851896

Vancouver

Stahl RM. Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times. Politics and Society. 2019;47(3):333-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219851896

Author

Stahl, Rune Møller. / Ruling the Interregnum : Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times. I: Politics and Society. 2019 ; Bind 47, Nr. 3. s. 333-360.

Bibtex

@article{a95bafa422b9417a9396beaf63cb8853,
title = "Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times",
abstract = "This article offers reinterpretation of the current economic and political crisis through the lens of Gramsci{\textquoteright}s concept of “interregnum,” departing from the model of “punctured equilibrium” to analyze the specific political dynamics of nonhegemonic periods between the breakdown of one ideological order and the emergence of a new one. Although political science has a range theories about periods of hegemony and paradigmatic stability, the periods between stable hegemonies remain distinctly undertheorized. A theoretical concept describing periods of interregnum is offered and applied to the changes in economic ideology and political alignments that followed the breakdown of the liberal order in the interwar period and the postwar Keynesian consensus of the 1970s. The concept is then applied to the current juncture, in which the hegemony of neoliberalism has been shaken by the 2008 financial crisis but no clear successor has emerged.",
keywords = "Gramsci, crisis, hegemony, institutional change, international political economy, neoliberalism",
author = "Stahl, {Rune M{\o}ller}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0032329219851896",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "333--360",
journal = "Politics and Society",
issn = "0032-3292",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ruling the Interregnum

T2 - Politics and Ideology in Nonhegemonic Times

AU - Stahl, Rune Møller

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article offers reinterpretation of the current economic and political crisis through the lens of Gramsci’s concept of “interregnum,” departing from the model of “punctured equilibrium” to analyze the specific political dynamics of nonhegemonic periods between the breakdown of one ideological order and the emergence of a new one. Although political science has a range theories about periods of hegemony and paradigmatic stability, the periods between stable hegemonies remain distinctly undertheorized. A theoretical concept describing periods of interregnum is offered and applied to the changes in economic ideology and political alignments that followed the breakdown of the liberal order in the interwar period and the postwar Keynesian consensus of the 1970s. The concept is then applied to the current juncture, in which the hegemony of neoliberalism has been shaken by the 2008 financial crisis but no clear successor has emerged.

AB - This article offers reinterpretation of the current economic and political crisis through the lens of Gramsci’s concept of “interregnum,” departing from the model of “punctured equilibrium” to analyze the specific political dynamics of nonhegemonic periods between the breakdown of one ideological order and the emergence of a new one. Although political science has a range theories about periods of hegemony and paradigmatic stability, the periods between stable hegemonies remain distinctly undertheorized. A theoretical concept describing periods of interregnum is offered and applied to the changes in economic ideology and political alignments that followed the breakdown of the liberal order in the interwar period and the postwar Keynesian consensus of the 1970s. The concept is then applied to the current juncture, in which the hegemony of neoliberalism has been shaken by the 2008 financial crisis but no clear successor has emerged.

KW - Gramsci

KW - crisis

KW - hegemony

KW - institutional change

KW - international political economy

KW - neoliberalism

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/ruling-interregnum-politics-ideology-nonhegemonic-times

U2 - 10.1177/0032329219851896

DO - 10.1177/0032329219851896

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 333

EP - 360

JO - Politics and Society

JF - Politics and Society

SN - 0032-3292

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 225432400