Defending democracy: liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Defending democracy : liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense. / Stahl, Rune Møller; Popp-Madsen, Benjamin Ask.

2019. Paper præsenteret ved Movements and Morality , Copenhagen, Danmark.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Stahl, RM & Popp-Madsen, BA 2019, 'Defending democracy: liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense', Paper fremlagt ved Movements and Morality , Copenhagen, Danmark, 28/05/2019 - 29/05/2019.

APA

Stahl, R. M., & Popp-Madsen, B. A. (2019). Defending democracy: liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense. Paper præsenteret ved Movements and Morality , Copenhagen, Danmark.

Vancouver

Stahl RM, Popp-Madsen BA. Defending democracy: liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense. 2019. Paper præsenteret ved Movements and Morality , Copenhagen, Danmark.

Author

Stahl, Rune Møller ; Popp-Madsen, Benjamin Ask. / Defending democracy : liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense. Paper præsenteret ved Movements and Morality , Copenhagen, Danmark.

Bibtex

@conference{46386167975e4cd49c97879a1e552853,
title = "Defending democracy: liberal and republican modes of democratic self-defense",
abstract = "According to many scholars, liberal democracy is in crisis and the widespread emergence of populism in the US andacross Europe is the clearly visible result of such crisis. One dominant way to remedy is proposed crisis and combat populism is the strategy of militant democracy, which seeks to exclude and ban certain parties, groups and statements from political life. We believe this strategy is both normative questionable and politically inefficient.Instead, we propose a reformulation of the sources of the contemporary democratic crises, from militant democracy{\textquoteright}s insistenceon {\textquoteleft}the people{\textquoteright}as theproblem to the unaccountability and excessive power of the elites as problem. Moreover, instead of proposing the depoliticizing and exclusionary strategy of militant democracy as the remedy to political extremism, we propose an {\textquoteleft}anti-oligarchic{\textquoteright}strategy, which seeks to politicize the defense of democracy by re-introducing class into democratic politics. ",
author = "Stahl, {Rune M{\o}ller} and Popp-Madsen, {Benjamin Ask}",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "28",
language = "English",
note = "Movements and Morality ; Conference date: 28-05-2019 Through 29-05-2019",
url = "https://www.tilmeld.dk/MM19/the-event.html",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Defending democracy

T2 - Movements and Morality

AU - Stahl, Rune Møller

AU - Popp-Madsen, Benjamin Ask

PY - 2019/5/28

Y1 - 2019/5/28

N2 - According to many scholars, liberal democracy is in crisis and the widespread emergence of populism in the US andacross Europe is the clearly visible result of such crisis. One dominant way to remedy is proposed crisis and combat populism is the strategy of militant democracy, which seeks to exclude and ban certain parties, groups and statements from political life. We believe this strategy is both normative questionable and politically inefficient.Instead, we propose a reformulation of the sources of the contemporary democratic crises, from militant democracy’s insistenceon ‘the people’as theproblem to the unaccountability and excessive power of the elites as problem. Moreover, instead of proposing the depoliticizing and exclusionary strategy of militant democracy as the remedy to political extremism, we propose an ‘anti-oligarchic’strategy, which seeks to politicize the defense of democracy by re-introducing class into democratic politics.

AB - According to many scholars, liberal democracy is in crisis and the widespread emergence of populism in the US andacross Europe is the clearly visible result of such crisis. One dominant way to remedy is proposed crisis and combat populism is the strategy of militant democracy, which seeks to exclude and ban certain parties, groups and statements from political life. We believe this strategy is both normative questionable and politically inefficient.Instead, we propose a reformulation of the sources of the contemporary democratic crises, from militant democracy’s insistenceon ‘the people’as theproblem to the unaccountability and excessive power of the elites as problem. Moreover, instead of proposing the depoliticizing and exclusionary strategy of militant democracy as the remedy to political extremism, we propose an ‘anti-oligarchic’strategy, which seeks to politicize the defense of democracy by re-introducing class into democratic politics.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 28 May 2019 through 29 May 2019

ER -

ID: 220859155