Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Differentiated (dis)integration in practice : The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics. / Svendsen, Øyvind; Adler-Nissen, Rebecca.

I: Journal of Common Market Studies, Bind 57, Nr. 6, 11.2019, s. 1419-1430.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Svendsen, Ø & Adler-Nissen, R 2019, 'Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics', Journal of Common Market Studies, bind 57, nr. 6, s. 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12960

APA

Svendsen, Ø., & Adler-Nissen, R. (2019). Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12960

Vancouver

Svendsen Ø, Adler-Nissen R. Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2019 nov.;57(6):1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12960

Author

Svendsen, Øyvind ; Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. / Differentiated (dis)integration in practice : The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics. I: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2019 ; Bind 57, Nr. 6. s. 1419-1430.

Bibtex

@article{14f3abecab1f4dceb6466cdb71452a40,
title = "Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics",
abstract = "This article advances a practice‐approach to differentiated (dis)integration in European security and defence in light of Brexit. We propose that understanding how differentiation in the area of security and defence is given meaning on the ground requires examining the everyday social practices of officials and military professionals. Therefore, we focus on the “low politics” of security and defence cooperation in Europe. We do so by entering the diplomatic “engine room” in the EU's Political and Security Committee. We show how arguments that Brexit will be the ultimate death blow to the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy or that it will be the catalyst for deeper military cooperation, fail to take account of the social dynamics and the historical path of existing security and military cooperation in Europe. Future research on differentiation should pay particular attention to how such mechanisms plays out in everyday social negotiation of meaning among practitioners.",
author = "{\O}yvind Svendsen and Rebecca Adler-Nissen",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/jcms.12960",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1419--1430",
journal = "Journal of Common Market Studies",
issn = "0021-9886",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiated (dis)integration in practice

T2 - The diplomacy of Brexit and the “low” politics of “high” politics

AU - Svendsen, Øyvind

AU - Adler-Nissen, Rebecca

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - This article advances a practice‐approach to differentiated (dis)integration in European security and defence in light of Brexit. We propose that understanding how differentiation in the area of security and defence is given meaning on the ground requires examining the everyday social practices of officials and military professionals. Therefore, we focus on the “low politics” of security and defence cooperation in Europe. We do so by entering the diplomatic “engine room” in the EU's Political and Security Committee. We show how arguments that Brexit will be the ultimate death blow to the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy or that it will be the catalyst for deeper military cooperation, fail to take account of the social dynamics and the historical path of existing security and military cooperation in Europe. Future research on differentiation should pay particular attention to how such mechanisms plays out in everyday social negotiation of meaning among practitioners.

AB - This article advances a practice‐approach to differentiated (dis)integration in European security and defence in light of Brexit. We propose that understanding how differentiation in the area of security and defence is given meaning on the ground requires examining the everyday social practices of officials and military professionals. Therefore, we focus on the “low politics” of security and defence cooperation in Europe. We do so by entering the diplomatic “engine room” in the EU's Political and Security Committee. We show how arguments that Brexit will be the ultimate death blow to the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy or that it will be the catalyst for deeper military cooperation, fail to take account of the social dynamics and the historical path of existing security and military cooperation in Europe. Future research on differentiation should pay particular attention to how such mechanisms plays out in everyday social negotiation of meaning among practitioners.

U2 - 10.1111/jcms.12960

DO - 10.1111/jcms.12960

M3 - Journal article

VL - 57

SP - 1419

EP - 1430

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 228246831