Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. / McCargo, Duncan.

I: Critical Asian Studies, Bind 53, Nr. 2, 02.03.2021, s. 175-191.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

McCargo, D 2021, 'Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests', Critical Asian Studies, bind 53, nr. 2, s. 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522

APA

McCargo, D. (2021). Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. Critical Asian Studies, 53(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522

Vancouver

McCargo D. Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. Critical Asian Studies. 2021 mar. 2;53(2):175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522

Author

McCargo, Duncan. / Disruptors’ dilemma? Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests. I: Critical Asian Studies. 2021 ; Bind 53, Nr. 2. s. 175-191.

Bibtex

@article{c8228884730640588c4bda0f3637fda5,
title = "Disruptors{\textquoteright} dilemma?: Thailand{\textquoteright}s 2020 Gen Z protests",
abstract = "This article offers a preliminary analysis of the hundreds of youth-inspired mass protests staged in Thailand during 2020. It argues that while calling for reforms and flirting with revolutionary rhetoric, the protestors lacked a clear programmatic agenda and were primarily engaged in disrupting dominant narratives about the country{\textquoteright}s politics, especially in relation to the previously taboo question of the political role of the monarchy. Despite the ad hoc and sometimes incoherent nature of the protests, the students mounted a dramatic challenge to Thailand{\textquoteright}s ruling elite. Ultimately, the conflict exemplified a generational divide: people from Generation Z, aged under 25, have radically different understandings of power, deference and legitimacy from older population groups. Whatever happens to the protest movement in the short term, the demonstrators have made a decisive break with the old social consensus that existed during the long reign of the late King Bhumibol (1946–2016).",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, protests, generation z, students, monarchy, Thailand",
author = "Duncan McCargo",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "175--191",
journal = "Critical Asian Studies",
issn = "1467-2715",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disruptors’ dilemma?

T2 - Thailand’s 2020 Gen Z protests

AU - McCargo, Duncan

PY - 2021/3/2

Y1 - 2021/3/2

N2 - This article offers a preliminary analysis of the hundreds of youth-inspired mass protests staged in Thailand during 2020. It argues that while calling for reforms and flirting with revolutionary rhetoric, the protestors lacked a clear programmatic agenda and were primarily engaged in disrupting dominant narratives about the country’s politics, especially in relation to the previously taboo question of the political role of the monarchy. Despite the ad hoc and sometimes incoherent nature of the protests, the students mounted a dramatic challenge to Thailand’s ruling elite. Ultimately, the conflict exemplified a generational divide: people from Generation Z, aged under 25, have radically different understandings of power, deference and legitimacy from older population groups. Whatever happens to the protest movement in the short term, the demonstrators have made a decisive break with the old social consensus that existed during the long reign of the late King Bhumibol (1946–2016).

AB - This article offers a preliminary analysis of the hundreds of youth-inspired mass protests staged in Thailand during 2020. It argues that while calling for reforms and flirting with revolutionary rhetoric, the protestors lacked a clear programmatic agenda and were primarily engaged in disrupting dominant narratives about the country’s politics, especially in relation to the previously taboo question of the political role of the monarchy. Despite the ad hoc and sometimes incoherent nature of the protests, the students mounted a dramatic challenge to Thailand’s ruling elite. Ultimately, the conflict exemplified a generational divide: people from Generation Z, aged under 25, have radically different understandings of power, deference and legitimacy from older population groups. Whatever happens to the protest movement in the short term, the demonstrators have made a decisive break with the old social consensus that existed during the long reign of the late King Bhumibol (1946–2016).

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - protests

KW - generation z

KW - students

KW - monarchy

KW - Thailand

U2 - 10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522

DO - 10.1080/14672715.2021.1876522

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 175

EP - 191

JO - Critical Asian Studies

JF - Critical Asian Studies

SN - 1467-2715

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 257618656