How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change? / Persson, Anders.

I: Middle East Critique, Bind 27, Nr. 4, 09.10.2018, s. 335-349.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Persson, A 2018, 'How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change?', Middle East Critique, bind 27, nr. 4, s. 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021

APA

Persson, A. (2018). How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change? Middle East Critique, 27(4), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021

Vancouver

Persson A. How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change? Middle East Critique. 2018 okt. 9;27(4):335-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021

Author

Persson, Anders. / How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change?. I: Middle East Critique. 2018 ; Bind 27, Nr. 4. s. 335-349.

Bibtex

@article{e8f3cf50b3cb46188cf5c1e9706cd038,
title = "How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change?",
abstract = "The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or the Israeli-Arab conflict/the conflict in the Middle East, as it was called in official EC/EU language all the way up to the 2000s, presented what was widely perceived in Europe to be a golden opportunity for the EC to unite its foreign policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, as important that goal was, many European politicians—from left to right—simultaneously saw an equally golden opportunity for the EC to contribute to help resolve the conflict. The EC/EU{\textquoteright}s self-perceived {\textquoteleft}special,{\textquoteright} {\textquoteleft}moral,{\textquoteright} {\textquoteleft}unique{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}distinctive{\textquoteright} role as a peace-builder is one of the defining features of its 50-years involvement in the conflict. Another defining feature during these five decades of EC/EU involvement in the conflict is the centrality of the conflict for instability/stability in the wider Middle East. There are many references in the Bulletin of the EC/EU describing the conflict as lying at the heart of continuing tension in the Near East or being of the utmost importance to Europe and to the whole world.",
author = "Anders Persson",
note = "Special Issue: The occupation at 50: EU-Israel/Palestine relations since 1967 ",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "335--349",
journal = "Middle East Critique",
issn = "1943-6149",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How, When and Why Did the Way the EU Speaks About the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Change?

AU - Persson, Anders

N1 - Special Issue: The occupation at 50: EU-Israel/Palestine relations since 1967

PY - 2018/10/9

Y1 - 2018/10/9

N2 - The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or the Israeli-Arab conflict/the conflict in the Middle East, as it was called in official EC/EU language all the way up to the 2000s, presented what was widely perceived in Europe to be a golden opportunity for the EC to unite its foreign policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, as important that goal was, many European politicians—from left to right—simultaneously saw an equally golden opportunity for the EC to contribute to help resolve the conflict. The EC/EU’s self-perceived ‘special,’ ‘moral,’ ‘unique’ and ‘distinctive’ role as a peace-builder is one of the defining features of its 50-years involvement in the conflict. Another defining feature during these five decades of EC/EU involvement in the conflict is the centrality of the conflict for instability/stability in the wider Middle East. There are many references in the Bulletin of the EC/EU describing the conflict as lying at the heart of continuing tension in the Near East or being of the utmost importance to Europe and to the whole world.

AB - The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or the Israeli-Arab conflict/the conflict in the Middle East, as it was called in official EC/EU language all the way up to the 2000s, presented what was widely perceived in Europe to be a golden opportunity for the EC to unite its foreign policy in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, as important that goal was, many European politicians—from left to right—simultaneously saw an equally golden opportunity for the EC to contribute to help resolve the conflict. The EC/EU’s self-perceived ‘special,’ ‘moral,’ ‘unique’ and ‘distinctive’ role as a peace-builder is one of the defining features of its 50-years involvement in the conflict. Another defining feature during these five decades of EC/EU involvement in the conflict is the centrality of the conflict for instability/stability in the wider Middle East. There are many references in the Bulletin of the EC/EU describing the conflict as lying at the heart of continuing tension in the Near East or being of the utmost importance to Europe and to the whole world.

U2 - 10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021

DO - 10.1080/19436149.2018.1516021

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 335

EP - 349

JO - Middle East Critique

JF - Middle East Critique

SN - 1943-6149

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 203667942