'Human Beings in the Round': Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

'Human Beings in the Round' : Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences. / Gabriel, Norman; Kaspersen, Lars Bo.

I: History of the Human Sciences, Bind 27, Nr. 3, 07.2014, s. 3.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gabriel, N & Kaspersen, LB 2014, ''Human Beings in the Round': Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences', History of the Human Sciences, bind 27, nr. 3, s. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114539803

APA

Gabriel, N., & Kaspersen, L. B. (2014). 'Human Beings in the Round': Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences. History of the Human Sciences, 27(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114539803

Vancouver

Gabriel N, Kaspersen LB. 'Human Beings in the Round': Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 2014 jul.;27(3):3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114539803

Author

Gabriel, Norman ; Kaspersen, Lars Bo. / 'Human Beings in the Round' : Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences. I: History of the Human Sciences. 2014 ; Bind 27, Nr. 3. s. 3.

Bibtex

@article{ba73b09206d34e2ca6cdac87f0489164,
title = "'Human Beings in the Round': Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences",
abstract = "In this introduction we highlight Norbert Elias{\textquoteright}s bold attempt to build a general model of the human sciences, integrating the social and natural sciences. We point to a range of different disciplines, emphasizing how he rarely developed a consistent critique of individual disciplines, though he often made some very fruitful suggestions about they should be reconceptualized in a relational and more integrative way. Based on our own research on survival units and the contributions to this special issue, we discuss the innovative potential of his ambition for transdisciplinary research, while at the same time offering an overview of some of the limitations in his theoretical perspective. We reassess his attempt to integrate the natural and social sciences within one universal testable model, and, at the same time, we consider areas like religion and economics that were rarely systematically investigated in his own theoretical approach. ",
author = "Norman Gabriel and Kaspersen, {Lars Bo}",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1177/0952695114539803",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "3",
journal = "History of the Human Sciences",
issn = "0952-6951",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Human Beings in the Round'

T2 - Towards a General Theory of the Human Sciences

AU - Gabriel, Norman

AU - Kaspersen, Lars Bo

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - In this introduction we highlight Norbert Elias’s bold attempt to build a general model of the human sciences, integrating the social and natural sciences. We point to a range of different disciplines, emphasizing how he rarely developed a consistent critique of individual disciplines, though he often made some very fruitful suggestions about they should be reconceptualized in a relational and more integrative way. Based on our own research on survival units and the contributions to this special issue, we discuss the innovative potential of his ambition for transdisciplinary research, while at the same time offering an overview of some of the limitations in his theoretical perspective. We reassess his attempt to integrate the natural and social sciences within one universal testable model, and, at the same time, we consider areas like religion and economics that were rarely systematically investigated in his own theoretical approach.

AB - In this introduction we highlight Norbert Elias’s bold attempt to build a general model of the human sciences, integrating the social and natural sciences. We point to a range of different disciplines, emphasizing how he rarely developed a consistent critique of individual disciplines, though he often made some very fruitful suggestions about they should be reconceptualized in a relational and more integrative way. Based on our own research on survival units and the contributions to this special issue, we discuss the innovative potential of his ambition for transdisciplinary research, while at the same time offering an overview of some of the limitations in his theoretical perspective. We reassess his attempt to integrate the natural and social sciences within one universal testable model, and, at the same time, we consider areas like religion and economics that were rarely systematically investigated in his own theoretical approach.

U2 - 10.1177/0952695114539803

DO - 10.1177/0952695114539803

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 3

JO - History of the Human Sciences

JF - History of the Human Sciences

SN - 0952-6951

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 125968253