Late Sovereign Diplomacy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Late Sovereign Diplomacy. / Adler-Nissen, Rebecca.

I: Hague Journal of Diplomacy, Bind 4, Nr. 2, 2009, s. 121-141.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Adler-Nissen, R 2009, 'Late Sovereign Diplomacy', Hague Journal of Diplomacy, bind 4, nr. 2, s. 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119109X440870

APA

Adler-Nissen, R. (2009). Late Sovereign Diplomacy. Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119109X440870

Vancouver

Adler-Nissen R. Late Sovereign Diplomacy. Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 2009;4(2):121-141. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119109X440870

Author

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. / Late Sovereign Diplomacy. I: Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 2009 ; Bind 4, Nr. 2. s. 121-141.

Bibtex

@article{2f455fe0462a11de87b8000ea68e967b,
title = "Late Sovereign Diplomacy",
abstract = "Most scholars are inclined to assume that the diplomatic practices of the European Union's member states remain fundamentally unchanged. The EU's Council of Ministers is accordingly seen as a setting where sovereign states speak with one another. Yet if state interaction in the EU is only viewed from this perspective, a number of important qualitative changes will remain underexposed. This article argues that leading political forces in the European states have come to view their nations as anchored so deeply within the supranational institutions of the EU that their diplomats merge the promotion of national interests with those of the Union. In this late sovereign phase of diplomacy, political and legal authorities overlap, territorial exclusivity is replaced with functional boundaries, and states begin to speak with one voice. The article explores three interlinked aspects of late sovereign diplomacy: the teleological interpretation of the EC and EU treaties; the intense socialization of state representatives; and the negotiation process, which promotes national positions as part of a European cause, thereby delocalizing the national interest. While the EU has not rendered national diplomacy obsolete, it has profoundly changed its meaning and consequences.",
author = "Rebecca Adler-Nissen",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1163/187119109X440870",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "121--141",
journal = "The Hague Journal of Diplomacy",
issn = "1871-1901",
publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Late Sovereign Diplomacy

AU - Adler-Nissen, Rebecca

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Most scholars are inclined to assume that the diplomatic practices of the European Union's member states remain fundamentally unchanged. The EU's Council of Ministers is accordingly seen as a setting where sovereign states speak with one another. Yet if state interaction in the EU is only viewed from this perspective, a number of important qualitative changes will remain underexposed. This article argues that leading political forces in the European states have come to view their nations as anchored so deeply within the supranational institutions of the EU that their diplomats merge the promotion of national interests with those of the Union. In this late sovereign phase of diplomacy, political and legal authorities overlap, territorial exclusivity is replaced with functional boundaries, and states begin to speak with one voice. The article explores three interlinked aspects of late sovereign diplomacy: the teleological interpretation of the EC and EU treaties; the intense socialization of state representatives; and the negotiation process, which promotes national positions as part of a European cause, thereby delocalizing the national interest. While the EU has not rendered national diplomacy obsolete, it has profoundly changed its meaning and consequences.

AB - Most scholars are inclined to assume that the diplomatic practices of the European Union's member states remain fundamentally unchanged. The EU's Council of Ministers is accordingly seen as a setting where sovereign states speak with one another. Yet if state interaction in the EU is only viewed from this perspective, a number of important qualitative changes will remain underexposed. This article argues that leading political forces in the European states have come to view their nations as anchored so deeply within the supranational institutions of the EU that their diplomats merge the promotion of national interests with those of the Union. In this late sovereign phase of diplomacy, political and legal authorities overlap, territorial exclusivity is replaced with functional boundaries, and states begin to speak with one voice. The article explores three interlinked aspects of late sovereign diplomacy: the teleological interpretation of the EC and EU treaties; the intense socialization of state representatives; and the negotiation process, which promotes national positions as part of a European cause, thereby delocalizing the national interest. While the EU has not rendered national diplomacy obsolete, it has profoundly changed its meaning and consequences.

U2 - 10.1163/187119109X440870

DO - 10.1163/187119109X440870

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 121

EP - 141

JO - The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

JF - The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

SN - 1871-1901

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 12331786