Man vs. the System

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Man vs. the System. / Ozdamar, Ozgur; Devlen, Balkan.

Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism?. red. / R. Belloni; V. Della Sala; P. Viotti. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. s. 177-195 (Global Issues Series).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ozdamar, O & Devlen, B 2019, Man vs. the System. i R Belloni, V Della Sala & P Viotti (red), Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Global Issues Series, s. 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

APA

Ozdamar, O., & Devlen, B. (2019). Man vs. the System. I R. Belloni, V. Della Sala, & P. Viotti (red.), Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism? (s. 177-195). Palgrave Macmillan. Global Issues Series https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

Vancouver

Ozdamar O, Devlen B. Man vs. the System. I Belloni R, Della Sala V, Viotti P, red., Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism?. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. s. 177-195. (Global Issues Series). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

Author

Ozdamar, Ozgur ; Devlen, Balkan. / Man vs. the System. Fear and Uncertainty in Europe: The Return to Realism?. red. / R. Belloni ; V. Della Sala ; P. Viotti. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. s. 177-195 (Global Issues Series).

Bibtex

@inbook{114f402673c6452595108503603e9d02,
title = "Man vs. the System",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to examine the much-debated Turkish foreign policy preferences towards the Middle East during the Arab uprisings through a neoclassical realist framework. Turkey is a middle power in the international system and in order to grasp Turkey{\textquoteright}s decision makers{\textquoteright} policy toward the region, it is important to comprehend human factors (perceptions, analysis, heuristics, analogies, cultural references) and variables of domestic politics (public opinion, electoral processes, border cities, Turkey{\textquoteright}s own ethno-religious structure). If we only examine systemic factors, it is impossible to explain tensions derived from asymmetries between roles and motivations of a state prescribed by its leaders and its actual abilities. In this context, explanations regarding domestic politics and character of leadership become important. Examining how decision makers reach specific decisions through interpreting structural pressures and Turkey{\textquoteright}s desire to “shape” the region with its own cognitive perspectives as well as how they synthesize this with the necessities of the domestic political cycles will provide an insight to understand decisions that seem unintelligible at first glance.",
author = "Ozgur Ozdamar and Balkan Devlen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319919645",
series = "Global Issues Series",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
pages = "177--195",
editor = "R. Belloni and {Della Sala}, V. and P. Viotti",
booktitle = "Fear and Uncertainty in Europe",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Man vs. the System

AU - Ozdamar, Ozgur

AU - Devlen, Balkan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The aim of this article is to examine the much-debated Turkish foreign policy preferences towards the Middle East during the Arab uprisings through a neoclassical realist framework. Turkey is a middle power in the international system and in order to grasp Turkey’s decision makers’ policy toward the region, it is important to comprehend human factors (perceptions, analysis, heuristics, analogies, cultural references) and variables of domestic politics (public opinion, electoral processes, border cities, Turkey’s own ethno-religious structure). If we only examine systemic factors, it is impossible to explain tensions derived from asymmetries between roles and motivations of a state prescribed by its leaders and its actual abilities. In this context, explanations regarding domestic politics and character of leadership become important. Examining how decision makers reach specific decisions through interpreting structural pressures and Turkey’s desire to “shape” the region with its own cognitive perspectives as well as how they synthesize this with the necessities of the domestic political cycles will provide an insight to understand decisions that seem unintelligible at first glance.

AB - The aim of this article is to examine the much-debated Turkish foreign policy preferences towards the Middle East during the Arab uprisings through a neoclassical realist framework. Turkey is a middle power in the international system and in order to grasp Turkey’s decision makers’ policy toward the region, it is important to comprehend human factors (perceptions, analysis, heuristics, analogies, cultural references) and variables of domestic politics (public opinion, electoral processes, border cities, Turkey’s own ethno-religious structure). If we only examine systemic factors, it is impossible to explain tensions derived from asymmetries between roles and motivations of a state prescribed by its leaders and its actual abilities. In this context, explanations regarding domestic politics and character of leadership become important. Examining how decision makers reach specific decisions through interpreting structural pressures and Turkey’s desire to “shape” the region with its own cognitive perspectives as well as how they synthesize this with the necessities of the domestic political cycles will provide an insight to understand decisions that seem unintelligible at first glance.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-91965-2_9

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9783319919645

T3 - Global Issues Series

SP - 177

EP - 195

BT - Fear and Uncertainty in Europe

A2 - Belloni, R.

A2 - Della Sala, V.

A2 - Viotti, P.

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Cham

ER -

ID: 215235070