The end of International Relations theory?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The end of International Relations theory? / Dunne, Tim; Hansen, Lene; Wight, Colin.

I: European Journal of International Relations, Bind 19, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 405-425 .

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Dunne, T, Hansen, L & Wight, C 2013, 'The end of International Relations theory?', European Journal of International Relations, bind 19, nr. 3, s. 405-425 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

APA

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405-425 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Vancouver

Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(3):405-425 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Author

Dunne, Tim ; Hansen, Lene ; Wight, Colin. / The end of International Relations theory?. I: European Journal of International Relations. 2013 ; Bind 19, Nr. 3. s. 405-425 .

Bibtex

@article{c1f0310f96da4d42b0c0ba8ef0eed7d5,
title = "The end of International Relations theory?",
abstract = "With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of {\textquoteleft}The end of International Relations theory?{\textquoteright} It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned",
author = "Tim Dunne and Lene Hansen and Colin Wight",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/1354066113495485",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "405--425 ",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The end of International Relations theory?

AU - Dunne, Tim

AU - Hansen, Lene

AU - Wight, Colin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned

AB - With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of ‘The end of International Relations theory?’ It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned

U2 - 10.1177/1354066113495485

DO - 10.1177/1354066113495485

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 405

EP - 425

JO - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 55643393