The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The missing link : How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. / Lind, Jonas Krog.
I: Research Evaluation, Bind 28, Nr. 1, 8, 2019, s. 84-93.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The missing link
T2 - How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system
AU - Lind, Jonas Krog
N1 - Special Issue: Keynote addresses from STI 2017
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The impact of Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the literature has focused on individual-level or country-level effects, mostly ignoring the ‘missing link’ between PRFSs and their effects: university managers. Drawing upon the sociology of numbers and theories of organizational translation, this article uses the concepts of actionability and legitimacy to analyse how and why managers at two Danish universities undertook local translations of a new Bibliometric Research Indicator (BRI). While scholars have emphasized how research evaluation systems can be either strong or weak by design, this study demonstrates how local managers to some extent make national systems strong or weak. The study also finds though that managers’ translations are conditioned by a range of background factors. These factors are identified as financial incentives, problem definitions, indicator competition, and identity and culture.
AB - The impact of Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the literature has focused on individual-level or country-level effects, mostly ignoring the ‘missing link’ between PRFSs and their effects: university managers. Drawing upon the sociology of numbers and theories of organizational translation, this article uses the concepts of actionability and legitimacy to analyse how and why managers at two Danish universities undertook local translations of a new Bibliometric Research Indicator (BRI). While scholars have emphasized how research evaluation systems can be either strong or weak by design, this study demonstrates how local managers to some extent make national systems strong or weak. The study also finds though that managers’ translations are conditioned by a range of background factors. These factors are identified as financial incentives, problem definitions, indicator competition, and identity and culture.
U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvy038
DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvy038
M3 - Journal article
VL - 28
SP - 84
EP - 93
JO - Research Evaluation
JF - Research Evaluation
SN - 0958-2029
IS - 1
M1 - 8
ER -
ID: 209711582