The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The missing link : How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. / Lind, Jonas Krog.

I: Research Evaluation, Bind 28, Nr. 1, 8, 2019, s. 84-93.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lind, JK 2019, 'The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system', Research Evaluation, bind 28, nr. 1, 8, s. 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy038

APA

Lind, J. K. (2019). The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 84-93. [8]. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy038

Vancouver

Lind JK. The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation. 2019;28(1):84-93. 8. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy038

Author

Lind, Jonas Krog. / The missing link : How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. I: Research Evaluation. 2019 ; Bind 28, Nr. 1. s. 84-93.

Bibtex

@article{61c61954c87b491ba2a72643ab7e3277,
title = "The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system",
abstract = "The impact of Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the literature has focused on individual-level or country-level effects, mostly ignoring the {\textquoteleft}missing link{\textquoteright} between PRFSs and their effects: university managers. Drawing upon the sociology of numbers and theories of organizational translation, this article uses the concepts of actionability and legitimacy to analyse how and why managers at two Danish universities undertook local translations of a new Bibliometric Research Indicator (BRI). While scholars have emphasized how research evaluation systems can be either strong or weak by design, this study demonstrates how local managers to some extent make national systems strong or weak. The study also finds though that managers{\textquoteright} translations are conditioned by a range of background factors. These factors are identified as financial incentives, problem definitions, indicator competition, and identity and culture.",
author = "Lind, {Jonas Krog}",
note = "Special Issue: Keynote addresses from STI 2017",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvy038",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Research Evaluation",
issn = "0958-2029",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The missing link

T2 - How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system

AU - Lind, Jonas Krog

N1 - Special Issue: Keynote addresses from STI 2017

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The impact of Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the literature has focused on individual-level or country-level effects, mostly ignoring the ‘missing link’ between PRFSs and their effects: university managers. Drawing upon the sociology of numbers and theories of organizational translation, this article uses the concepts of actionability and legitimacy to analyse how and why managers at two Danish universities undertook local translations of a new Bibliometric Research Indicator (BRI). While scholars have emphasized how research evaluation systems can be either strong or weak by design, this study demonstrates how local managers to some extent make national systems strong or weak. The study also finds though that managers’ translations are conditioned by a range of background factors. These factors are identified as financial incentives, problem definitions, indicator competition, and identity and culture.

AB - The impact of Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) has received increasing attention in recent years. However, the literature has focused on individual-level or country-level effects, mostly ignoring the ‘missing link’ between PRFSs and their effects: university managers. Drawing upon the sociology of numbers and theories of organizational translation, this article uses the concepts of actionability and legitimacy to analyse how and why managers at two Danish universities undertook local translations of a new Bibliometric Research Indicator (BRI). While scholars have emphasized how research evaluation systems can be either strong or weak by design, this study demonstrates how local managers to some extent make national systems strong or weak. The study also finds though that managers’ translations are conditioned by a range of background factors. These factors are identified as financial incentives, problem definitions, indicator competition, and identity and culture.

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvy038

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvy038

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

SN - 0958-2029

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -

ID: 209711582