Three locals of peace: a typology of local capacities for peace

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Three locals of peace : a typology of local capacities for peace. / Philipsen, Lise.

I: Third World Quarterly, Bind 43, Nr. 8, 03.08.2022, s. 1932-1949.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Philipsen, L 2022, 'Three locals of peace: a typology of local capacities for peace', Third World Quarterly, bind 43, nr. 8, s. 1932-1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720

APA

Philipsen, L. (2022). Three locals of peace: a typology of local capacities for peace. Third World Quarterly, 43(8), 1932-1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720

Vancouver

Philipsen L. Three locals of peace: a typology of local capacities for peace. Third World Quarterly. 2022 aug. 3;43(8):1932-1949. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720

Author

Philipsen, Lise. / Three locals of peace : a typology of local capacities for peace. I: Third World Quarterly. 2022 ; Bind 43, Nr. 8. s. 1932-1949.

Bibtex

@article{8f8e98b862dc4ceab3017a222daa14fc,
title = "Three locals of peace: a typology of local capacities for peace",
abstract = "In recent thinking on peace, the 'local' has taken centre stage, carrying our last hopes after decades of 'failed' peacebuilding. The local can, however, denote quite a variety of different actors. How we select and define the kind of local to work with has huge implications. By developing a typology of three kinds of locals, this piece points to how installing the local as pivotal for establishing peace can take very different forms, implying vastly different policies. These different ways of conceptualising the role of the local, and what are seen as possible ways of engaging with the people who are at the receiving end of peacebuilding interventions, carry political value and reveal shifts in the political terrain of interventions. The article points to how engaging with locals might serve as an attempt at evading the political and ethical consequences of intervention, yet shows how such avoidance of political consequences fails by pointing to the political and ethical choices implied in choosing what kind of locals to work with.",
keywords = "Peacebuilding, local turn, civil society, United Nations, prevention, stabilisation, LIBERAL PEACE, HYBRIDITY, Peacebuilding, local turn, civil society, United Nations, prevention, stabilisation",
author = "Lise Philipsen",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1932--1949",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three locals of peace

T2 - a typology of local capacities for peace

AU - Philipsen, Lise

PY - 2022/8/3

Y1 - 2022/8/3

N2 - In recent thinking on peace, the 'local' has taken centre stage, carrying our last hopes after decades of 'failed' peacebuilding. The local can, however, denote quite a variety of different actors. How we select and define the kind of local to work with has huge implications. By developing a typology of three kinds of locals, this piece points to how installing the local as pivotal for establishing peace can take very different forms, implying vastly different policies. These different ways of conceptualising the role of the local, and what are seen as possible ways of engaging with the people who are at the receiving end of peacebuilding interventions, carry political value and reveal shifts in the political terrain of interventions. The article points to how engaging with locals might serve as an attempt at evading the political and ethical consequences of intervention, yet shows how such avoidance of political consequences fails by pointing to the political and ethical choices implied in choosing what kind of locals to work with.

AB - In recent thinking on peace, the 'local' has taken centre stage, carrying our last hopes after decades of 'failed' peacebuilding. The local can, however, denote quite a variety of different actors. How we select and define the kind of local to work with has huge implications. By developing a typology of three kinds of locals, this piece points to how installing the local as pivotal for establishing peace can take very different forms, implying vastly different policies. These different ways of conceptualising the role of the local, and what are seen as possible ways of engaging with the people who are at the receiving end of peacebuilding interventions, carry political value and reveal shifts in the political terrain of interventions. The article points to how engaging with locals might serve as an attempt at evading the political and ethical consequences of intervention, yet shows how such avoidance of political consequences fails by pointing to the political and ethical choices implied in choosing what kind of locals to work with.

KW - Peacebuilding

KW - local turn

KW - civil society

KW - United Nations

KW - prevention

KW - stabilisation

KW - LIBERAL PEACE

KW - HYBRIDITY

KW - Peacebuilding

KW - local turn

KW - civil society

KW - United Nations

KW - prevention

KW - stabilisation

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2022.2077720

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 1932

EP - 1949

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 342569331