Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Citizen (Dis)satisfaction : An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study. / Olsen, Asmus Leth.

I: Public Administration Review, Bind 75, Nr. 3, 2015, s. 469-478.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Olsen, AL 2015, 'Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study', Public Administration Review, bind 75, nr. 3, s. 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12337

APA

Olsen, A. L. (2015). Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12337

Vancouver

Olsen AL. Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study. Public Administration Review. 2015;75(3):469-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12337

Author

Olsen, Asmus Leth. / Citizen (Dis)satisfaction : An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study. I: Public Administration Review. 2015 ; Bind 75, Nr. 3. s. 469-478.

Bibtex

@article{5b09c28486914dc08355a7408aa07089,
title = "Citizen (Dis)satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study",
abstract = "This article introduces the importance of equivalence framing for understanding how satisfaction measures affect citizens{\textquoteright} evaluation of public services. Does a 90 percent satisfaction rate have a different effect than a logically equivalent 10 percent dissatisfaction rate? Two experiments were conducted on citizens{\textquoteright} evaluations of hospital services in a large, nationally representative sample of Danish citizens. Both experiments found that exposing citizens to a patient dissatisfaction measure led to more negative views of public service than exposing them to a logically equivalent satisfaction metric. There is some support for part of the shift in evaluations being caused by a negativity bias: dissatisfaction has a larger negative impact than satisfaction has a positive impact. Both professional experience at a hospital and prior exposure to satisfaction rates reduced the negative response to dissatisfaction rates. The results call for further study of equivalence framing of performance information.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, performance indicators, Experimental design, performance management, satisfaction, behavioral public administration",
author = "Olsen, {Asmus Leth}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/puar.12337",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "469--478",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizen (Dis)satisfaction

T2 - An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study

AU - Olsen, Asmus Leth

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article introduces the importance of equivalence framing for understanding how satisfaction measures affect citizens’ evaluation of public services. Does a 90 percent satisfaction rate have a different effect than a logically equivalent 10 percent dissatisfaction rate? Two experiments were conducted on citizens’ evaluations of hospital services in a large, nationally representative sample of Danish citizens. Both experiments found that exposing citizens to a patient dissatisfaction measure led to more negative views of public service than exposing them to a logically equivalent satisfaction metric. There is some support for part of the shift in evaluations being caused by a negativity bias: dissatisfaction has a larger negative impact than satisfaction has a positive impact. Both professional experience at a hospital and prior exposure to satisfaction rates reduced the negative response to dissatisfaction rates. The results call for further study of equivalence framing of performance information.

AB - This article introduces the importance of equivalence framing for understanding how satisfaction measures affect citizens’ evaluation of public services. Does a 90 percent satisfaction rate have a different effect than a logically equivalent 10 percent dissatisfaction rate? Two experiments were conducted on citizens’ evaluations of hospital services in a large, nationally representative sample of Danish citizens. Both experiments found that exposing citizens to a patient dissatisfaction measure led to more negative views of public service than exposing them to a logically equivalent satisfaction metric. There is some support for part of the shift in evaluations being caused by a negativity bias: dissatisfaction has a larger negative impact than satisfaction has a positive impact. Both professional experience at a hospital and prior exposure to satisfaction rates reduced the negative response to dissatisfaction rates. The results call for further study of equivalence framing of performance information.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - performance indicators

KW - Experimental design

KW - performance management

KW - satisfaction

KW - behavioral public administration

U2 - 10.1111/puar.12337

DO - 10.1111/puar.12337

M3 - Journal article

VL - 75

SP - 469

EP - 478

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 130523213