Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark. / Esmark, Anders; Bech Liengaard, Mikkel.

I: Journal of Social Policy, Bind 53, Nr. 1, 2023, s. 107-128.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Esmark, A & Bech Liengaard, M 2023, 'Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark', Journal of Social Policy, bind 53, nr. 1, s. 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000034

APA

Esmark, A., & Bech Liengaard, M. (2023). Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark. Journal of Social Policy, 53(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000034

Vancouver

Esmark A, Bech Liengaard M. Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark. Journal of Social Policy. 2023;53(1):107-128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000034

Author

Esmark, Anders ; Bech Liengaard, Mikkel. / Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients? A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark. I: Journal of Social Policy. 2023 ; Bind 53, Nr. 1. s. 107-128.

Bibtex

@article{afc313d204584595b63362fc4c98a3e4,
title = "Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients?: A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark",
abstract = "The role of street-level bureaucracy in social policy has been taken up by two relatively distinct streams of research, based on Lipsky{\textquoteright}s foundational work (2010). One group of literature has focused on the organizational working conditions, practices and coping mechanisms of street-level bureaucrats, their impact on the implementation of political programs and reforms, and the scope for discretion in the face of political pressures and institutional demands (Brodkin and Marston, 2013; Jessen and Tufte, 2014; Breit et al., 2016; Van Berkel et al., 2017; van Berkel, 2020). Starting from a focus on interaction with clients and the direct impact of discretionary decisions {\textquoteleft}on people{\textquoteright}s lives{\textquoteright} (Lipsky, 2010, 8), a second group of studies has focused more on differences in allocation of benefits caused by perceived {\textquoteleft}deservingness{\textquoteright} and discrimination among street-level bureaucrats (Altreiter and Leibetseder, 2014; Terum et al., 2018; Jilke and Tummers, 2018).",
author = "Anders Esmark and {Bech Liengaard}, Mikkel",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1017/S0047279422000034",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "107--128",
journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
issn = "0047-2794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Ethnicity Affect Allocation of Unemployment-Related Benefits to Job Center Clients?

T2 - A Survey-Experimental Study of Representative Bureaucracy in Denmark

AU - Esmark, Anders

AU - Bech Liengaard, Mikkel

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The role of street-level bureaucracy in social policy has been taken up by two relatively distinct streams of research, based on Lipsky’s foundational work (2010). One group of literature has focused on the organizational working conditions, practices and coping mechanisms of street-level bureaucrats, their impact on the implementation of political programs and reforms, and the scope for discretion in the face of political pressures and institutional demands (Brodkin and Marston, 2013; Jessen and Tufte, 2014; Breit et al., 2016; Van Berkel et al., 2017; van Berkel, 2020). Starting from a focus on interaction with clients and the direct impact of discretionary decisions ‘on people’s lives’ (Lipsky, 2010, 8), a second group of studies has focused more on differences in allocation of benefits caused by perceived ‘deservingness’ and discrimination among street-level bureaucrats (Altreiter and Leibetseder, 2014; Terum et al., 2018; Jilke and Tummers, 2018).

AB - The role of street-level bureaucracy in social policy has been taken up by two relatively distinct streams of research, based on Lipsky’s foundational work (2010). One group of literature has focused on the organizational working conditions, practices and coping mechanisms of street-level bureaucrats, their impact on the implementation of political programs and reforms, and the scope for discretion in the face of political pressures and institutional demands (Brodkin and Marston, 2013; Jessen and Tufte, 2014; Breit et al., 2016; Van Berkel et al., 2017; van Berkel, 2020). Starting from a focus on interaction with clients and the direct impact of discretionary decisions ‘on people’s lives’ (Lipsky, 2010, 8), a second group of studies has focused more on differences in allocation of benefits caused by perceived ‘deservingness’ and discrimination among street-level bureaucrats (Altreiter and Leibetseder, 2014; Terum et al., 2018; Jilke and Tummers, 2018).

U2 - 10.1017/S0047279422000034

DO - 10.1017/S0047279422000034

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 107

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Social Policy

JF - Journal of Social Policy

SN - 0047-2794

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 298629853