Is there a behavioral revolution in policy design? A new agenda and inventory of the behavioral toolbox
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Is there a behavioral revolution in policy design? A new agenda and inventory of the behavioral toolbox. / Esmark, Anders.
I: Policy and Society, Bind 42, Nr. 4, 2023, s. 441–453.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is there a behavioral revolution in policy design?
T2 - A new agenda and inventory of the behavioral toolbox
AU - Esmark, Anders
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The article argues for a revised research on behavioral public policy focused on the core claim and sine qua non of a behavioral “revolution”: the ability to produce equal or better outcomes with less stringent policy designs than in traditional solutions, at least for certain types of problems. Three contributionsto such an agenda are proposed. First, the article argues that the growing focus on the evaluation of real-world behavioral policy programs, as opposed to experimental studies within specialized areas of research, calls for a corresponding theoretical orientation toward existing literature on policy toolsand design. Second, a doctrine of policy design is extrapolated from the broader behavioral paradigm and specifed in relation to four general areas of application. These provide an essential context for the evaluation of the behavioral claim to improved policy design and highlight that behavioral successes may well, contra this claim, be a result of a de facto increase in stringency vis-à-vis traditionalresponses. Third, the article proposes a new and substantially revised inventory of the behavioral toolbox, which specifes the stringency, mechanisms, and potential costs of different behavioral tools and techniques, which is both essential to the evaluation of the behavioral claim and necessary to overcomethe arbitrariness and mistakes of existing inventories.
AB - The article argues for a revised research on behavioral public policy focused on the core claim and sine qua non of a behavioral “revolution”: the ability to produce equal or better outcomes with less stringent policy designs than in traditional solutions, at least for certain types of problems. Three contributionsto such an agenda are proposed. First, the article argues that the growing focus on the evaluation of real-world behavioral policy programs, as opposed to experimental studies within specialized areas of research, calls for a corresponding theoretical orientation toward existing literature on policy toolsand design. Second, a doctrine of policy design is extrapolated from the broader behavioral paradigm and specifed in relation to four general areas of application. These provide an essential context for the evaluation of the behavioral claim to improved policy design and highlight that behavioral successes may well, contra this claim, be a result of a de facto increase in stringency vis-à-vis traditionalresponses. Third, the article proposes a new and substantially revised inventory of the behavioral toolbox, which specifes the stringency, mechanisms, and potential costs of different behavioral tools and techniques, which is both essential to the evaluation of the behavioral claim and necessary to overcomethe arbitrariness and mistakes of existing inventories.
U2 - 10.1093/polsoc/puad028
DO - 10.1093/polsoc/puad028
M3 - Journal article
VL - 42
SP - 441
EP - 453
JO - Policy and Society
JF - Policy and Society
SN - 1449-4035
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 375717248