Existential Security: Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Existential Security : Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? . / Hobson, Tom; Corry, Olaf.

I: Global Policy, Bind 14, Nr. 4, 2023, s. 633-637.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hobson, T & Corry, O 2023, 'Existential Security: Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? ', Global Policy, bind 14, nr. 4, s. 633-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13287

APA

Hobson, T., & Corry, O. (2023). Existential Security: Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? . Global Policy, 14(4), 633-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13287

Vancouver

Hobson T, Corry O. Existential Security: Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? . Global Policy. 2023;14(4):633-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13287

Author

Hobson, Tom ; Corry, Olaf. / Existential Security : Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? . I: Global Policy. 2023 ; Bind 14, Nr. 4. s. 633-637.

Bibtex

@article{ce4539b924bc4aecb1dd34d446b4242c,
title = "Existential Security: Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power? ",
abstract = "Sears{\textquoteright} {\textquoteleft}Existential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity{\textquoteright} (2020) is the first account within the field of ERS of how scholars in the field might explicitly define {\textquoteleft}security{\textquoteright} and translate it into a framework for motivating policy choices geared towards existential risks. His essay identifies and critiques two extant frameworks for security policy – human security and national security – contrasting them in terms of scale, referent object, threat prioritisation and means of enactment. He also reflects on a number of competing definitions of what security is, and how it relates to other aspects of politics and human values, constructing an account of what security is and what its political status might allow and legitimate in approaches to policy. Ultimately, he presents a largely positive picture of both the attainability and desirability of security, and of the utility of deploying security as a framework to elevate the importance and urgency of existential risks in contemporary political decision-making. ",
author = "Tom Hobson and Olaf Corry",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.13287",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "633--637",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Existential Security

T2 - Safeguarding Humanity or Globalising Power?

AU - Hobson, Tom

AU - Corry, Olaf

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Sears’ ‘Existential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity’ (2020) is the first account within the field of ERS of how scholars in the field might explicitly define ‘security’ and translate it into a framework for motivating policy choices geared towards existential risks. His essay identifies and critiques two extant frameworks for security policy – human security and national security – contrasting them in terms of scale, referent object, threat prioritisation and means of enactment. He also reflects on a number of competing definitions of what security is, and how it relates to other aspects of politics and human values, constructing an account of what security is and what its political status might allow and legitimate in approaches to policy. Ultimately, he presents a largely positive picture of both the attainability and desirability of security, and of the utility of deploying security as a framework to elevate the importance and urgency of existential risks in contemporary political decision-making.

AB - Sears’ ‘Existential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity’ (2020) is the first account within the field of ERS of how scholars in the field might explicitly define ‘security’ and translate it into a framework for motivating policy choices geared towards existential risks. His essay identifies and critiques two extant frameworks for security policy – human security and national security – contrasting them in terms of scale, referent object, threat prioritisation and means of enactment. He also reflects on a number of competing definitions of what security is, and how it relates to other aspects of politics and human values, constructing an account of what security is and what its political status might allow and legitimate in approaches to policy. Ultimately, he presents a largely positive picture of both the attainability and desirability of security, and of the utility of deploying security as a framework to elevate the importance and urgency of existential risks in contemporary political decision-making.

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.13287

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.13287

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 633

EP - 637

JO - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 359568110