The global conversation about solar geoengineering just changed at the UN Environment Assembly. Here’s how.
Publikation: Andet › Udgivelser på nettet - Net-publikation › Formidling
Duncan McLaren and Olaf Corry reflect on the implications of the UNEA-6 non-decision on solar radiation modification for research and governance
As we wrote in part 1, a Swiss-led proposal to the UN Environment Assembly (UNEA) to establish an expert group on solar radiation management (SRM) proved divisive and was eventually withdrawn. Here we explore why, and what that means for any global conversation about SRM.
As we wrote in part 1, a Swiss-led proposal to the UN Environment Assembly (UNEA) to establish an expert group on solar radiation management (SRM) proved divisive and was eventually withdrawn. Here we explore why, and what that means for any global conversation about SRM.
| Bidragets oversatte titel | Forhandlinger om global 'solskærm' går i sort (igen) - hvorfor er det så sværet for landet at blive enige |
|---|---|
| Originalsprog | Dansk |
| Publikationsdato | 8 mar. 2024 |
| Status | Udgivet - 8 mar. 2024 |
Links
- https://legal-planet.org/2024/03/08/the-global-conversation-about-solar-geoengineering-just-changed/
Forlagets udgivne version
ID: 385355972