Komparativ sekularisme: en forskningsdagsorden med konfliktmodererende potentiale
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Komparativ sekularisme : en forskningsdagsorden med konfliktmodererende potentiale. / Wæver, Ole.
I: Politica - Tidsskrift for Politisk Videnskab, Bind 43, Nr. 2, 2011, s. 163-185.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Komparativ sekularisme
T2 - en forskningsdagsorden med konfliktmodererende potentiale
AU - Wæver, Ole
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Conflicts over religion rarely play out today as 'wars of religion' between different religions. More often the battle is between one side wanting more religion in politics and a counterpart insisting on a strict seperation of religion and politics, the secularists. Here, secularism often appears as a given, un-ambiguous thing - and hardliners on both sides in these conflicts have an interest in confirming this image. In a conflict management perspective, however, it is crucial to demonstrate the variation between different secularisms. This article performs a systematic analysis of what is seperated from what, where and how in the allegedly secular states USA, France and Germany. The depth of their variation hopefully inhibits mechanisms of conflict escalation, and provides - more constructively - inspiration for possible reforms in a given situation, for instance the Danish one.
AB - Conflicts over religion rarely play out today as 'wars of religion' between different religions. More often the battle is between one side wanting more religion in politics and a counterpart insisting on a strict seperation of religion and politics, the secularists. Here, secularism often appears as a given, un-ambiguous thing - and hardliners on both sides in these conflicts have an interest in confirming this image. In a conflict management perspective, however, it is crucial to demonstrate the variation between different secularisms. This article performs a systematic analysis of what is seperated from what, where and how in the allegedly secular states USA, France and Germany. The depth of their variation hopefully inhibits mechanisms of conflict escalation, and provides - more constructively - inspiration for possible reforms in a given situation, for instance the Danish one.
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 43
SP - 163
EP - 185
JO - Politica - Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab
JF - Politica - Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab
SN - 0105-0710
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 33980741