Beyond believers and deniers: Towards a new map of climate politics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Beyond believers and deniers : Towards a new map of climate politics. / Corry, Olaf; Jørgensen, Dan.

I: Global Environmental Change, Bind 32, 14.05.2015, s. 165–174.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Corry, O & Jørgensen, D 2015, 'Beyond believers and deniers: Towards a new map of climate politics', Global Environmental Change, bind 32, s. 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006

APA

Corry, O., & Jørgensen, D. (2015). Beyond believers and deniers: Towards a new map of climate politics. Global Environmental Change, 32, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006

Vancouver

Corry O, Jørgensen D. Beyond believers and deniers: Towards a new map of climate politics. Global Environmental Change. 2015 maj 14;32:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006

Author

Corry, Olaf ; Jørgensen, Dan. / Beyond believers and deniers : Towards a new map of climate politics. I: Global Environmental Change. 2015 ; Bind 32. s. 165–174.

Bibtex

@article{979c43ac06d2496f88e8423a56f178ee,
title = "Beyond believers and deniers: Towards a new map of climate politics",
abstract = "The politics of climate change is not concerned solely with rival scientific claims about global warming but also with how best to govern the climate. Despite this, categories in climate politics remain caught up in the concepts of the {\textquoteleft}science wars{\textquoteright}, rarely progressing far beyond the denier/believer-dichotomy. This article aims to nudge climate politics beyond the polarized scientific debates while also counteracting the de-politicisation that comes from assuming scientific claims lead directly to certain policies. First existing typologies of climate political positions are reviewed. Diverse contributions make up an emerging field of {\textquoteleft}climate politology{\textquoteright} but these tend to reduce climate politics either to views on the science or to products of cultural world-views. Drawing on policy analysis literature, a new approach is outlined, where problem-definitions and solution-framings provide the coordinates for a two-dimensional grid. The degree to which climate change is considered a {\textquoteleft}wicked{\textquoteright} problem on the one hand, and individualist or collectivist ways of understanding political agency on the other, provide a map of climate political positions beyond {\textquoteleft}believers{\textquoteright} vs {\textquoteleft}deniers{\textquoteright}.",
author = "Olaf Corry and Dan J{\o}rgensen",
year = "2015",
month = may,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "165–174",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond believers and deniers

T2 - Towards a new map of climate politics

AU - Corry, Olaf

AU - Jørgensen, Dan

PY - 2015/5/14

Y1 - 2015/5/14

N2 - The politics of climate change is not concerned solely with rival scientific claims about global warming but also with how best to govern the climate. Despite this, categories in climate politics remain caught up in the concepts of the ‘science wars’, rarely progressing far beyond the denier/believer-dichotomy. This article aims to nudge climate politics beyond the polarized scientific debates while also counteracting the de-politicisation that comes from assuming scientific claims lead directly to certain policies. First existing typologies of climate political positions are reviewed. Diverse contributions make up an emerging field of ‘climate politology’ but these tend to reduce climate politics either to views on the science or to products of cultural world-views. Drawing on policy analysis literature, a new approach is outlined, where problem-definitions and solution-framings provide the coordinates for a two-dimensional grid. The degree to which climate change is considered a ‘wicked’ problem on the one hand, and individualist or collectivist ways of understanding political agency on the other, provide a map of climate political positions beyond ‘believers’ vs ‘deniers’.

AB - The politics of climate change is not concerned solely with rival scientific claims about global warming but also with how best to govern the climate. Despite this, categories in climate politics remain caught up in the concepts of the ‘science wars’, rarely progressing far beyond the denier/believer-dichotomy. This article aims to nudge climate politics beyond the polarized scientific debates while also counteracting the de-politicisation that comes from assuming scientific claims lead directly to certain policies. First existing typologies of climate political positions are reviewed. Diverse contributions make up an emerging field of ‘climate politology’ but these tend to reduce climate politics either to views on the science or to products of cultural world-views. Drawing on policy analysis literature, a new approach is outlined, where problem-definitions and solution-framings provide the coordinates for a two-dimensional grid. The degree to which climate change is considered a ‘wicked’ problem on the one hand, and individualist or collectivist ways of understanding political agency on the other, provide a map of climate political positions beyond ‘believers’ vs ‘deniers’.

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 165

EP - 174

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

ER -

ID: 147060490