Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel: constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel : constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism. / Cold-Ravnkilde, Signe Marie; Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov.

I: International Affairs, Bind 96, Nr. 4, 07.2020, s. 855–874.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Cold-Ravnkilde, SM & Jacobsen, KL 2020, 'Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel: constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism', International Affairs, bind 96, nr. 4, s. 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa093

APA

Cold-Ravnkilde, S. M., & Jacobsen, K. L. (2020). Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel: constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism. International Affairs, 96(4), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa093

Vancouver

Cold-Ravnkilde SM, Jacobsen KL. Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel: constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism. International Affairs. 2020 jul.;96(4):855–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa093

Author

Cold-Ravnkilde, Signe Marie ; Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov. / Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel : constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism. I: International Affairs. 2020 ; Bind 96, Nr. 4. s. 855–874.

Bibtex

@article{1363494874174bd3b794747385beef42,
title = "Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel: constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism",
abstract = "Despite years of ongoing interventions by multiple external and regional actors, the security situation in west Africa's Sahel region is dramatically deteriorating. In this introduction to the special section of the July 2020 issue of International Affairs, we zoom in on four major external international intervention actors (France, the United States, the European Union and the United Nations) in the Sahel region's escalating 'security traffic jam'. We argue that the diversity of intervention actors makes the Sahel a paradigmatic case for exploring a set of often-overlooked constitutive intervention effects. By adding new temporal, relational and spatial dimensions to the notion of 'constitutive effects' as introduced by post-structuralists in the 1990s, we (re)launch constitutive effects as a conceptual framework for approaching the study of ongoing intervention engagements. From this perspective, and as further illustrated in this special section, intervention continuity and escalation cannot be explained simply with reference to frameworks of 'success' or 'failure', but require a broader conceptualization of effects, including how specific threat perceptions, rationales and problematizations get constituted and consolidated through and during ongoing intervention practice. Contributions to this special section each unpack a diverse set of constitutive effects including the contested performance of security actorness, the (un)making of security alliances and partnerships, logics of choices produced by ongoing intervention practices, as well as the constitution of conditions for continual international involvement.",
keywords = "Africa, international security, International Relations theory, armed conflict, international interventions, war, SOVEREIGNTY, MALI, PEACE, MATERIALITY, GOVERNANCE, DANGER, LIMITS, ORDER, POWER",
author = "Cold-Ravnkilde, {Signe Marie} and Jacobsen, {Katja Lindskov}",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1093/ia/iiaa093",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "855–874",
journal = "International Affairs",
issn = "0020-5850",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling the security traffic jam in the Sahel

T2 - constitutive effects of contemporary interventionism

AU - Cold-Ravnkilde, Signe Marie

AU - Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - Despite years of ongoing interventions by multiple external and regional actors, the security situation in west Africa's Sahel region is dramatically deteriorating. In this introduction to the special section of the July 2020 issue of International Affairs, we zoom in on four major external international intervention actors (France, the United States, the European Union and the United Nations) in the Sahel region's escalating 'security traffic jam'. We argue that the diversity of intervention actors makes the Sahel a paradigmatic case for exploring a set of often-overlooked constitutive intervention effects. By adding new temporal, relational and spatial dimensions to the notion of 'constitutive effects' as introduced by post-structuralists in the 1990s, we (re)launch constitutive effects as a conceptual framework for approaching the study of ongoing intervention engagements. From this perspective, and as further illustrated in this special section, intervention continuity and escalation cannot be explained simply with reference to frameworks of 'success' or 'failure', but require a broader conceptualization of effects, including how specific threat perceptions, rationales and problematizations get constituted and consolidated through and during ongoing intervention practice. Contributions to this special section each unpack a diverse set of constitutive effects including the contested performance of security actorness, the (un)making of security alliances and partnerships, logics of choices produced by ongoing intervention practices, as well as the constitution of conditions for continual international involvement.

AB - Despite years of ongoing interventions by multiple external and regional actors, the security situation in west Africa's Sahel region is dramatically deteriorating. In this introduction to the special section of the July 2020 issue of International Affairs, we zoom in on four major external international intervention actors (France, the United States, the European Union and the United Nations) in the Sahel region's escalating 'security traffic jam'. We argue that the diversity of intervention actors makes the Sahel a paradigmatic case for exploring a set of often-overlooked constitutive intervention effects. By adding new temporal, relational and spatial dimensions to the notion of 'constitutive effects' as introduced by post-structuralists in the 1990s, we (re)launch constitutive effects as a conceptual framework for approaching the study of ongoing intervention engagements. From this perspective, and as further illustrated in this special section, intervention continuity and escalation cannot be explained simply with reference to frameworks of 'success' or 'failure', but require a broader conceptualization of effects, including how specific threat perceptions, rationales and problematizations get constituted and consolidated through and during ongoing intervention practice. Contributions to this special section each unpack a diverse set of constitutive effects including the contested performance of security actorness, the (un)making of security alliances and partnerships, logics of choices produced by ongoing intervention practices, as well as the constitution of conditions for continual international involvement.

KW - Africa

KW - international security

KW - International Relations theory

KW - armed conflict

KW - international interventions

KW - war

KW - SOVEREIGNTY

KW - MALI

KW - PEACE

KW - MATERIALITY

KW - GOVERNANCE

KW - DANGER

KW - LIMITS

KW - ORDER

KW - POWER

U2 - 10.1093/ia/iiaa093

DO - 10.1093/ia/iiaa093

M3 - Journal article

VL - 96

SP - 855

EP - 874

JO - International Affairs

JF - International Affairs

SN - 0020-5850

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 254986553