Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings : Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine. / Wæver, Ole.

I: Globalizations, Bind 20, Nr. 7, 2023, s. 1187-1194.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wæver, O 2023, 'Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine', Globalizations, bind 20, nr. 7, s. 1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594

APA

Wæver, O. (2023). Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine. Globalizations, 20(7), 1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594

Vancouver

Wæver O. Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine. Globalizations. 2023;20(7):1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594

Author

Wæver, Ole. / Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings : Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine. I: Globalizations. 2023 ; Bind 20, Nr. 7. s. 1187-1194.

Bibtex

@article{815f7e133b0348bab50fbbed00056a36,
title = "Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patom{\"a}ki, Debating the War in Ukraine",
abstract = "Futures past, historically open when they were our present, are often recast as pre-determined after dramatic events. The war in Ukraine displays this pattern, and makes the book by Forsberg and Patom{\"a}ki so welcome. It allows nuanced discussions of counterfactuals and causal complexes when the political climate favors reductionist, deterministic interpretations of who and what caused the war and what this implies for future possibilities. The book{\textquoteright}s dialogue format facilitates balanced analysis and its structure aroundtime phases adds complexity. Prevailing excessive learnings produce powerful policy guidance on false premises. However, the book underestimates the political forces involved in the writing of history treating public knowledge as an intellectual investigation writ large. Excessive mislearnings from the past follow not primarily from cognitive limitations distributed evenly – they are shaped by political struggles and a dominant folk conception of the nature of international relations. Enriching the analysis with a political sociology of knowledge.",
author = "Ole W{\ae}ver",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1187--1194",
journal = "Globalizations",
issn = "1474-7731",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings

T2 - Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine

AU - Wæver, Ole

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Futures past, historically open when they were our present, are often recast as pre-determined after dramatic events. The war in Ukraine displays this pattern, and makes the book by Forsberg and Patomäki so welcome. It allows nuanced discussions of counterfactuals and causal complexes when the political climate favors reductionist, deterministic interpretations of who and what caused the war and what this implies for future possibilities. The book’s dialogue format facilitates balanced analysis and its structure aroundtime phases adds complexity. Prevailing excessive learnings produce powerful policy guidance on false premises. However, the book underestimates the political forces involved in the writing of history treating public knowledge as an intellectual investigation writ large. Excessive mislearnings from the past follow not primarily from cognitive limitations distributed evenly – they are shaped by political struggles and a dominant folk conception of the nature of international relations. Enriching the analysis with a political sociology of knowledge.

AB - Futures past, historically open when they were our present, are often recast as pre-determined after dramatic events. The war in Ukraine displays this pattern, and makes the book by Forsberg and Patomäki so welcome. It allows nuanced discussions of counterfactuals and causal complexes when the political climate favors reductionist, deterministic interpretations of who and what caused the war and what this implies for future possibilities. The book’s dialogue format facilitates balanced analysis and its structure aroundtime phases adds complexity. Prevailing excessive learnings produce powerful policy guidance on false premises. However, the book underestimates the political forces involved in the writing of history treating public knowledge as an intellectual investigation writ large. Excessive mislearnings from the past follow not primarily from cognitive limitations distributed evenly – they are shaped by political struggles and a dominant folk conception of the nature of international relations. Enriching the analysis with a political sociology of knowledge.

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 1187

EP - 1194

JO - Globalizations

JF - Globalizations

SN - 1474-7731

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 337432623