Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations : the added value of practice approaches. / Graeger, Nina.

I: European Security, Bind 26, Nr. 3, 2017, s. 340-358.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Graeger, N 2017, 'Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches', European Security, bind 26, nr. 3, s. 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304

APA

Graeger, N. (2017). Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches. European Security, 26(3), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304

Vancouver

Graeger N. Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches. European Security. 2017;26(3):340-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304

Author

Graeger, Nina. / Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations : the added value of practice approaches. I: European Security. 2017 ; Bind 26, Nr. 3. s. 340-358.

Bibtex

@article{27e8f986fe6542b1855ee8267110fb40,
title = "Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches",
abstract = "Much scholarly work seeking to explain the EU–NATO relationship emphasises conflicting national or institutional interests, strategic individuals, and operational inefficiencies and overlaps. This article offers an alternative account of how both the everyday and the extraordinary in EU–NATO security cooperation can be identified and analysed by applying practice theory. Despite the “Cyprus issue”, which has left EU–NATO cooperation under Berlin Plus in political stalemate, regular interaction involving civilian and military EU and NATO staff at all levels and various sites has increased over the past decade. The article shows how a practice take is well suited to uncover the practical logic at work in these, predominantly informal EU–NATO encounters; how practices are established, enacted, and also abrupted. Furthermore, it discusses how shared “background conditions” – skills and experience – facilitate practices, learning, and community-building but also competition and rivalry.",
keywords = "EU-NATO relations, IR theory, European security, learning, practice theory, security practices",
author = "Nina Graeger",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "340--358",
journal = "European Security",
issn = "0966-2839",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations

T2 - the added value of practice approaches

AU - Graeger, Nina

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Much scholarly work seeking to explain the EU–NATO relationship emphasises conflicting national or institutional interests, strategic individuals, and operational inefficiencies and overlaps. This article offers an alternative account of how both the everyday and the extraordinary in EU–NATO security cooperation can be identified and analysed by applying practice theory. Despite the “Cyprus issue”, which has left EU–NATO cooperation under Berlin Plus in political stalemate, regular interaction involving civilian and military EU and NATO staff at all levels and various sites has increased over the past decade. The article shows how a practice take is well suited to uncover the practical logic at work in these, predominantly informal EU–NATO encounters; how practices are established, enacted, and also abrupted. Furthermore, it discusses how shared “background conditions” – skills and experience – facilitate practices, learning, and community-building but also competition and rivalry.

AB - Much scholarly work seeking to explain the EU–NATO relationship emphasises conflicting national or institutional interests, strategic individuals, and operational inefficiencies and overlaps. This article offers an alternative account of how both the everyday and the extraordinary in EU–NATO security cooperation can be identified and analysed by applying practice theory. Despite the “Cyprus issue”, which has left EU–NATO cooperation under Berlin Plus in political stalemate, regular interaction involving civilian and military EU and NATO staff at all levels and various sites has increased over the past decade. The article shows how a practice take is well suited to uncover the practical logic at work in these, predominantly informal EU–NATO encounters; how practices are established, enacted, and also abrupted. Furthermore, it discusses how shared “background conditions” – skills and experience – facilitate practices, learning, and community-building but also competition and rivalry.

KW - EU-NATO relations

KW - IR theory

KW - European security

KW - learning

KW - practice theory

KW - security practices

U2 - 10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304

DO - 10.1080/09662839.2017.1355304

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 340

EP - 358

JO - European Security

JF - European Security

SN - 0966-2839

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 230899940