Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen. / Græger, Nina.

I: Internasjonal Politikk, Bind 63, Nr. 2-3, 14.07.2005, s. 217-239+341.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Græger, N 2005, 'Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen', Internasjonal Politikk, bind 63, nr. 2-3, s. 217-239+341.

APA

Græger, N. (2005). Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen. Internasjonal Politikk, 63(2-3), 217-239+341.

Vancouver

Græger N. Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen. Internasjonal Politikk. 2005 jul. 14;63(2-3):217-239+341.

Author

Græger, Nina. / Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen. I: Internasjonal Politikk. 2005 ; Bind 63, Nr. 2-3. s. 217-239+341.

Bibtex

@article{93c90377c77240bea9b407fff3cf4866,
title = "Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen",
abstract = "Norway's security and defence policy was justified with reference to Cold War arguments well into the 1990s. The Norwegian NATO discourse, which is the topic of the article, is still focused on territorial defence, with allied support in an emergency situation, interoperability and alliance loyalty at its core. NATO increasingly is considered as a political instrument in which Norwegian force contributions to international operations are converted into political influence vis-{\`a}-vis Norway's allies. Some fear, however, that international engagement will reduce the national defence capacity, leaving Norway in a vulnerable situation with Russia in the northern areas. This view also reflects the opposition against defence reform, where NATO has been a central external driving force. NATO is still seen as the main arena for transatlantic relations in the Norwegian debate, whereas little attention is being paid to the ever more ambitious and capable EU. More striking, maybe, is that the attitude towards Norway's close relationship with the US, even after its unilateral turn since nine-eleven, does not seem to have changed.",
author = "Nina Gr{\ae}ger",
year = "2005",
month = jul,
day = "14",
language = "Norsk",
volume = "63",
pages = "217--239+341",
journal = "Internasjonal Politikk",
issn = "0020-577X",
publisher = "Universitetsforlaget AS",
number = "2-3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Norsk NATO-debatt etter den kalde krigen

AU - Græger, Nina

PY - 2005/7/14

Y1 - 2005/7/14

N2 - Norway's security and defence policy was justified with reference to Cold War arguments well into the 1990s. The Norwegian NATO discourse, which is the topic of the article, is still focused on territorial defence, with allied support in an emergency situation, interoperability and alliance loyalty at its core. NATO increasingly is considered as a political instrument in which Norwegian force contributions to international operations are converted into political influence vis-à-vis Norway's allies. Some fear, however, that international engagement will reduce the national defence capacity, leaving Norway in a vulnerable situation with Russia in the northern areas. This view also reflects the opposition against defence reform, where NATO has been a central external driving force. NATO is still seen as the main arena for transatlantic relations in the Norwegian debate, whereas little attention is being paid to the ever more ambitious and capable EU. More striking, maybe, is that the attitude towards Norway's close relationship with the US, even after its unilateral turn since nine-eleven, does not seem to have changed.

AB - Norway's security and defence policy was justified with reference to Cold War arguments well into the 1990s. The Norwegian NATO discourse, which is the topic of the article, is still focused on territorial defence, with allied support in an emergency situation, interoperability and alliance loyalty at its core. NATO increasingly is considered as a political instrument in which Norwegian force contributions to international operations are converted into political influence vis-à-vis Norway's allies. Some fear, however, that international engagement will reduce the national defence capacity, leaving Norway in a vulnerable situation with Russia in the northern areas. This view also reflects the opposition against defence reform, where NATO has been a central external driving force. NATO is still seen as the main arena for transatlantic relations in the Norwegian debate, whereas little attention is being paid to the ever more ambitious and capable EU. More striking, maybe, is that the attitude towards Norway's close relationship with the US, even after its unilateral turn since nine-eleven, does not seem to have changed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21444439226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:21444439226

VL - 63

SP - 217-239+341

JO - Internasjonal Politikk

JF - Internasjonal Politikk

SN - 0020-577X

IS - 2-3

ER -

ID: 231649066