Public Management on the Ground: Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Public Management on the Ground : Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior. / Pedersen, Mogens Jin; Favero, Nathan; Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann; Meier, Kenneth J.

I: International Public Management Journal, Bind 22, Nr. 2, 3, 2019, s. 254-294.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Pedersen, MJ, Favero, N, Nielsen, VL & Meier, KJ 2019, 'Public Management on the Ground: Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior', International Public Management Journal, bind 22, nr. 2, 3, s. 254-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273

APA

Pedersen, M. J., Favero, N., Nielsen, V. L., & Meier, K. J. (2019). Public Management on the Ground: Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior. International Public Management Journal, 22(2), 254-294. [3]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273

Vancouver

Pedersen MJ, Favero N, Nielsen VL, Meier KJ. Public Management on the Ground: Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior. International Public Management Journal. 2019;22(2):254-294. 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273

Author

Pedersen, Mogens Jin ; Favero, Nathan ; Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann ; Meier, Kenneth J. / Public Management on the Ground : Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior. I: International Public Management Journal. 2019 ; Bind 22, Nr. 2. s. 254-294.

Bibtex

@article{94070185758247fa9568e0796e905384,
title = "Public Management on the Ground: Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior",
abstract = "Public management research has identified a dizzying array of management variables that affect organizational performance. While scholars have learned much by analyzing one or a few specific behavioral dimensions of public management at a time, we argue for the value of a more holistic and inductive approach that uses data on several aspects of public management for identifying manager types. Such an approach accounts for both the cognitive processes of people affected by management and the reality that managers{\textquoteright} individual behavioral decisions are interrelated. We examine the overlap of 21 aspects of public school management behavior using cluster analysis. We identify four different manager types (“firefighters,” “laissez-faire managers,” “administrators,” and “proactive floor managers”), each reflecting a distinct constellation of managerial behaviors. The manager types we call “administrators” and “proactive floor managers” are associated with relatively better outcomes, while “firefighters” are associated with relatively worse outcomes.",
author = "Pedersen, {Mogens Jin} and Nathan Favero and Nielsen, {Vibeke Lehmann} and Meier, {Kenneth J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "254--294",
journal = "International Public Management Journal",
issn = "1096-7494",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Management on the Ground

T2 - Clustering Managers Based on Their Behavior

AU - Pedersen, Mogens Jin

AU - Favero, Nathan

AU - Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann

AU - Meier, Kenneth J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Public management research has identified a dizzying array of management variables that affect organizational performance. While scholars have learned much by analyzing one or a few specific behavioral dimensions of public management at a time, we argue for the value of a more holistic and inductive approach that uses data on several aspects of public management for identifying manager types. Such an approach accounts for both the cognitive processes of people affected by management and the reality that managers’ individual behavioral decisions are interrelated. We examine the overlap of 21 aspects of public school management behavior using cluster analysis. We identify four different manager types (“firefighters,” “laissez-faire managers,” “administrators,” and “proactive floor managers”), each reflecting a distinct constellation of managerial behaviors. The manager types we call “administrators” and “proactive floor managers” are associated with relatively better outcomes, while “firefighters” are associated with relatively worse outcomes.

AB - Public management research has identified a dizzying array of management variables that affect organizational performance. While scholars have learned much by analyzing one or a few specific behavioral dimensions of public management at a time, we argue for the value of a more holistic and inductive approach that uses data on several aspects of public management for identifying manager types. Such an approach accounts for both the cognitive processes of people affected by management and the reality that managers’ individual behavioral decisions are interrelated. We examine the overlap of 21 aspects of public school management behavior using cluster analysis. We identify four different manager types (“firefighters,” “laissez-faire managers,” “administrators,” and “proactive floor managers”), each reflecting a distinct constellation of managerial behaviors. The manager types we call “administrators” and “proactive floor managers” are associated with relatively better outcomes, while “firefighters” are associated with relatively worse outcomes.

U2 - 10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273

DO - 10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 254

EP - 294

JO - International Public Management Journal

JF - International Public Management Journal

SN - 1096-7494

IS - 2

M1 - 3

ER -

ID: 227088412