The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’. / Rosamond, Ben.

I: Journal of European Public Policy, Bind 12, Nr. 2, 2005, s. 237-254.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rosamond, B 2005, 'The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’', Journal of European Public Policy, bind 12, nr. 2, s. 237-254.

APA

Rosamond, B. (2005). The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 237-254.

Vancouver

Rosamond B. The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’. Journal of European Public Policy. 2005;12(2):237-254.

Author

Rosamond, Ben. / The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’. I: Journal of European Public Policy. 2005 ; Bind 12, Nr. 2. s. 237-254.

Bibtex

@article{6299f2f07aa7448ba954f5e0e37b9c7d,
title = "The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "This article suggests that the neofunctionalist theoretical legacy left by Ernst B. Haas is somewhat richer and more prescient than many contemporary discussants allow. The article develops an argument for routine and detailed rereading of the corpus of neofunctionalist work (and that of Haas in particular), not only to disabuse contemporary students and scholars of the normally static and stylized reading that discussion of the theory provokes, but also to suggest that the conceptual repertoire of neofunctionalism is able to speak directly to current EU studies and comparative regionalism. Neofunctionalism is situated in its social scientific context before the theory{\textquoteright}s supposed erroneous reliance on the concept of {\textquoteleft}spillover{\textquoteright} is discussed critically. A case is then made for viewing Haas{\textquoteright}s neofunctionalism as a dynamic theory that not only corresponded to established social scientific norms, but did so in ways that were consistent with disciplinary openness and pluralism.",
author = "Ben Rosamond",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "237--254",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Uniting of Europe and the Foundations of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’

AU - Rosamond, Ben

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This article suggests that the neofunctionalist theoretical legacy left by Ernst B. Haas is somewhat richer and more prescient than many contemporary discussants allow. The article develops an argument for routine and detailed rereading of the corpus of neofunctionalist work (and that of Haas in particular), not only to disabuse contemporary students and scholars of the normally static and stylized reading that discussion of the theory provokes, but also to suggest that the conceptual repertoire of neofunctionalism is able to speak directly to current EU studies and comparative regionalism. Neofunctionalism is situated in its social scientific context before the theory’s supposed erroneous reliance on the concept of ‘spillover’ is discussed critically. A case is then made for viewing Haas’s neofunctionalism as a dynamic theory that not only corresponded to established social scientific norms, but did so in ways that were consistent with disciplinary openness and pluralism.

AB - This article suggests that the neofunctionalist theoretical legacy left by Ernst B. Haas is somewhat richer and more prescient than many contemporary discussants allow. The article develops an argument for routine and detailed rereading of the corpus of neofunctionalist work (and that of Haas in particular), not only to disabuse contemporary students and scholars of the normally static and stylized reading that discussion of the theory provokes, but also to suggest that the conceptual repertoire of neofunctionalism is able to speak directly to current EU studies and comparative regionalism. Neofunctionalism is situated in its social scientific context before the theory’s supposed erroneous reliance on the concept of ‘spillover’ is discussed critically. A case is then made for viewing Haas’s neofunctionalism as a dynamic theory that not only corresponded to established social scientific norms, but did so in ways that were consistent with disciplinary openness and pluralism.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 237

EP - 254

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 33001292